The U.S. tax reform, the biggest in about 30 years, committed by President Donald Trump is expected to pass the Senate and the House of Representatives this week. The reform will reduce the attention-attracting corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% in 2018, bringing a record $1.5 trillion in overall tax cuts over the next 10 years. Financial resources for the tax cuts are envisioned to be covered by future revenue increase to be gained with economic growth acceleration resulting from the tax cuts.
Tax cuts cannot accelerate economic growth
     The tax reform bill proposed by the Republican Party, with a focus on massive corporate tax cuts, is primarily designed for demand expansion through the tax cuts, as indicated by President Trump’s statement that the tax reform would be “a big Christmas present.” Generally speaking, tax cuts are expected to boost economic growth over a short term by increasing disposable income to stimulate consumer spending and corporate investment in plant and equipment. However, a tax reform to expand supply rather than demand is more important. Such reform is expected to accelerate productivity improvement and capital stock growth to raise growth potential. Required for raising U.S. growth potential is the tax reform to expand supply.
     While President Trump expects that the tax cuts would accelerate U.S. economic growth to more than 4%, Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen refrains from sharing the expectation with Trump. The Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee has left a projected long-term U.S. economic growth rate unchanged at 1.8%. Massive tax cuts and fiscal spending expansion, though pushing up the GDP growth rate over a short term, may fail to increase growth potential, with any economic pickup ending up short-lived. We must prepare for a harsh reaction to a possible failure of expectations placed on the Trump policy.
Big impact of dollar reflux
     The massive corporate tax cut is likely to encourage U.S. and foreign companies to expand investment in the United States, stimulating the U.S. economy. The Fed may be prompted to raise interest rates, leading to a dollar reflux into the United States.
     European countries getting on a recovery path cannot afford to further cut their tax to counter the U.S. policy because of their huge debt.
     Learning from lessons from massive capital outflow from 2015 to 2016, China has toughened capital regulations. As the U.S. tax reform leads to greater inflation and interest rate hikes to induce a dollar reflux into the United States over a long term, however, it may be difficult for China alone to take advantage of its monetary policy for preventing a decline in investment from abroad. Rather, the dollar reflux could accelerate U.S. companies’ reshoring home.
     The latest U.S. reform will lead the U.S. corporate tax rate to slip below South Korea’s maximum tax rate, while U.S. interest rates is expected to rise above South Korean rates. Such reversal will have no small impact on South Korea. Other emerging or developing countries will be exposed to immeasurable effects of the dollar reflux into the United States.
     As for Japan, improving productivity to enhance business competitiveness without joining a race to cut corporate tax is an urgent issue.
Yujiro Oiwa is a JINF Planning Committee Member and Professor at Tokyo International University.
(Editor's note: The US drastic tax cut bill was passed through both houses on December 20.)

 Tsutomu Nishioka
Tsutomu Nishioka Tadae Takubo
Tadae Takubo Fumio Ota
Fumio Ota Takashi Arimoto
Takashi Arimoto Yoshiko Sakurai
Yoshiko Sakurai Yasushi Tomiyama
Yasushi Tomiyama Yoichi Shimada
Yoichi Shimada Masahiko Hosokawa
Masahiko Hosokawa Hiroshi Yuasa
Hiroshi Yuasa Tadashi Narabayashi
Tadashi Narabayashi Hideo Tamura
Hideo Tamura Kiyofumi Iwata
Kiyofumi Iwata Etsuro Honda
Etsuro Honda Kunio Orita
Kunio Orita Hironobu Ishikawa
Hironobu Ishikawa Shiro Takahashi
Shiro Takahashi Katsuhiko Takaike
Katsuhiko Takaike Akira Momochi
Akira Momochi Maki Nakagawa
Maki Nakagawa Yoshihiko Yamada
Yoshihiko Yamada Akio Yaita
Akio Yaita Michio Ezaki
Michio Ezaki Seiji Kurosawa
Seiji Kurosawa Brahma Chellaney
Brahma Chellaney Nobuko Araki
Nobuko Araki James Auer
James Auer Yang Haiying
Yang Haiying Hiroshi Kimura
Hiroshi Kimura Sumihiko Kawamura
Sumihiko Kawamura Kenro Nagoshi
Kenro Nagoshi Takeshi Kudo
Takeshi Kudo Osamu Nishi
Osamu Nishi Koko Kato
Koko Kato Tadashi Saito
Tadashi Saito Shohei Umezawa
Shohei Umezawa Jason Morgan
Jason Morgan Arvind Gupta
Arvind Gupta Kichinosuke Ihara
Kichinosuke Ihara Hisashi Matsumoto
Hisashi Matsumoto Nobuyuki Sato
Nobuyuki Sato Sukehiro Hirakawa
Sukehiro Hirakawa Eriko Yamatani
Eriko Yamatani Koichi Furusho
Koichi Furusho Satoshi Hirano
Satoshi Hirano Lee Woo Young
Lee Woo Young Taro Yayama
Taro Yayama Tsutomu Toichi
Tsutomu Toichi Hideaki Karaki
Hideaki Karaki Andrii Gurenko
Andrii Gurenko Kazuhiko Inoue
Kazuhiko Inoue Katsutoshi Kawano
Katsutoshi Kawano Chung Dae Kyun
Chung Dae Kyun Toshio Watanabe
Toshio Watanabe Katsuya Tsukamoto
Katsuya Tsukamoto Kazuto Suzuki
Kazuto Suzuki Hirotaka Watanabe
Hirotaka Watanabe Akinaka Senzaki
Akinaka Senzaki Kevin Maher
Kevin Maher Yang Yi
Yang Yi Masanori Kondo
Masanori Kondo Hiroshi Ito
Hiroshi Ito Rupakjyoti Borah
Rupakjyoti Borah Seiichi Okutomi
Seiichi Okutomi Saburo Tsukamoto
Saburo Tsukamoto Yen-Hung Lin
Yen-Hung Lin Sanae Takaichi
Sanae Takaichi Haruhisa Nakagawa
Haruhisa Nakagawa Ryoichi Hamamoto
Ryoichi Hamamoto
